Canon XF100 field report and DVD Studio Pro problem

I recently purchased a new Canon XF100 video camera to replace my Canon XL2. I primarily film events, presentations, interviews, bar mitzvah and wedding ceremonies, and the like. I was attracted to the XF100 for several reasons:
  • direct-to-compact flash recording with media rollover for continuous recording
  • 50mbps 4:2:2 editable codec (no rendering in Final Cut Pro timelines)
  • XLR inputs with phantom power
So the other night I took it on its maiden voyage. I filmed a local theater group’s play for my very first “real” assignment with the XF100. It took a few minutes to figure out the audio inputs, as I was shooting with a line input from the sound board in input A and my Sennheiser shotgun in input B. One thing to report is that my Sennheiser does not fit in the mic mount (it’s too thin). I guess it’s easy to wrap it in gaffers tape or something, but I think I’m just going to use my shock mount in the cold shoe.

I shot at 35mbps so that I could get 57 minutes out of my two 16GB cards, knowing that I was transcoding down to DVD for delivery. I was very happy with the overall performance during the filming. I used my $30 OEM battery and it still showed over 50% capacity after 2 hours of runtime. I used autofocus and it worked well. I shot wide open at 1/48 and 0db gain, and that was perfect, along with tungsten white balance.

I used rsync (a built-in Unix utility in OS X) to copy each of the CF card images to my hard drive. Then I used Log and Transfer in FCP to wrap the video in native form to Quicktime (not ProRes). Everything went swimmingly.

But I ran into an interesting problem in DVD Studio Pro. I used the Compressor preset “DVD Best Quality 120 Minutes” setting to transcode to DVD format. Then I created a DVD Studio Pro project to burn the DVD itself. But the DVDSP muxing process error’d out, with very little information other than “Bad Video File Error”. Nothing I tried would work. So, on a hunch, I re-encoded (2 hours!!!) the video using a 1-pass encode (to save time), but dropped the VBR data rate a bit (4.6-6.0). And that worked. So I re-encoded overnight with the 2-pass encode using the lower data rates and it worked properly.

I’ve done hundreds of DVDs and I’ve never had a problem of this nature. Is there too much data in the files? I’m perplexed. Doesn’t seem rational.

Anyway, I’m a happy camper!

  1. steve posted the following on May 25, 2011 at 6:07 am.

    Hi Dan.
    I am still putting it through its paces. I definitely would have gone with the XF300 (and may still) if it wasn’t for the considerable premium in price. I actually would prefer the larger size, although now I’m considering a crane setup and the size of the XF100 is a big advantage for that.
    Stay tuned…

  2. Daniel Lewis posted the following on May 25, 2011 at 3:14 am.

    Hi Steve,

    Can you please give further feedback on the XF100? How are you finding using a smaller camera than the larger XL2?

    Is it performing well in low light such as the conditions you found in the theater?

    How do you reckon it will work in live wedding ceremony situations? Did you consider the larger XF300?

    Cheers,

    Dan


Leave a reply